• @StorminNorman
    link
    111 months ago

    No. They don’t have normal representation via normal election. This has been proven numerous times. Since the Morrison govt. It’s the whole reason the voice was proposed. Do you think people just went “I’m bored, let’s cause a stir”. No. This was based on facts, something you’ve decided to completely ignore.

    • TheHolm
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      From top of my head they are 3.8% of population. So they should be heard for that 3.8%. And about Ignored, I’m not claiming it is wrong, but could you please provide some references.

        • TheHolm
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          Thanks for link. But article does not explain why they need voice more than any other minor group. There are many groups which was wrong in the past, why they are not getting voice?

          • @StorminNorman
            link
            1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Did you read the whole thing? Cos it certainly covers that. Just because you don’t understand it and can’t parse out the relevant information doesn’t mean I haven’t given it to you.

            • TheHolm
              link
              fedilink
              011 months ago

              I did. There is nothing there explaining why they need help in any other way than any other disadvantaged group.

              • @StorminNorman
                link
                111 months ago

                Again, your English sucks. The whole article is the reason why. They’re not gonna sit there and compare it to every minority group in Australia you giant cockwomble…

                • TheHolm
                  link
                  fedilink
                  011 months ago

                  So homeless for example do not deserve special voice but aboriginals does? Cut this racist shit, if voice was about helping one who in need it will be total different matter.