• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    Sounds like they need to update their system.

    Maybe it’s just me, but in the digital age I don’t think there’s an excuse for systems like this to be too difficult to change. Heck, if you designed it like an idiot, then you deserve to pay the costs to fix it.

    I know Japan lives in the stone age when it comes to governing, but that’s simply not an excuse. Do better. Take money from your ruling class to fix these issues.

    It’s do-able. Let’s get off our fucking hands and do it.

    • darq
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      Sounds like they need to update their system.

      Oh definitely. Desperately.

      Maybe it’s just me, but in the digital age I don’t think there’s an excuse for systems like this to be too difficult to change. Heck, if you designed it like an idiot, then you deserve to pay the costs to fix it.

      Thing is. I don’t even think it would be that difficult to change. It’s not like it’s the first time we’ve ever had newer versions of forms. And the change isn’t even drastic, just de-gender the terms. Partner 1 and Partner 2, Parent 1 and Parent 2.

      One of the simple benefits of the paper-based way Japan tends to favour is that it can be updated and overriden by the person performing the process.

    • DarkenLM
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Boy, thank God that you don’t have to deal with the draconian legacy codebases that governments have. There’s a reason no sane engineer wants to get even near them, and it’s because any change, no matter how small it is, completely breaks the entire system and no-one knows how.

      Sure, a new system could be developed from the side, but implies getting engineers in a higher level than interns and governments don’t have good reasons to hire them. Their broken system gives them the perfect excuse for their bullshittery.