• @theragu40
    link
    81 year ago

    Is it normalizing? Or just pointing out how things are today?

    It’s possible to describe reality without approving of it.

    I don’t like that lakefront property is so expensive, but it surely is. I’ve been casually looking for years and I don’t know if I’ll ever afford it. And the headline is complaining about a shed selling for $225k when it’s pretty obviously the land and lakefront access that comes with it that is selling for that amount. The structure is a throw in and there’s a good chance whoever buys it simply demolishes it to build what they want.

    • @the_q
      link
      -3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @theragu40
        link
        41 year ago

        So what is your contention? That people should just say that land doesn’t cost what it actually costs? I don’t understand.

        • @the_q
          link
          -1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @theragu40
            link
            41 year ago

            But surely some land or homes have more desirable features? Should an acre of beautiful lakefront property command the same value as a dirt lot next to a dirty industrial park?

            Either way, let’s say your idea for how land and homes should be valued is executable in the real world. I still don’t understand why acknowledging the way things are in reality as things stand right now is the same as normalizing it. Ignoring something doesn’t get it changed.

            • @the_q
              link
              -1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • @theragu40
                link
                51 year ago

                I don’t think this conversation is happening in good faith. I wish you the best.

                • @the_q
                  link
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  deleted by creator