• @archonet
    link
    English
    -101
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Maybe be the change you want to see in the world instead of bitching, then.

    edit: go ahead and keep downvoting me, when the right does finally manage a coup they’ll be the only ones with any guns you stupid motherfuckers. For now, the 2nd amendment is your right – you want to forgo it until they take it away from you (and only you), be my guest.

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        241 year ago

        If you check the other thread here, he’s clearly not.

        • GONADS125
          link
          31 year ago

          He’s clearly a troll. Don’t feed the trolls, people.

          • @AbidanYre
            link
            English
            61 year ago

            His new flare also says he’s banned from the community, so … mission accomplished?

            • GONADS125
              link
              61 year ago

              His profile did say the mods hate him haha. Good riddance.

        • @hardcoreufo
          link
          141 year ago

          I’m doing great thanks for asking. You seem kinda angry. Putting down the Internet for the night might be a good idea.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      I’m pro-gun but anti-2A precisely because of fuckers like you who insist we can’t do anything about this stuff because 2A so we just have to live with mass shootings.

      Nope if 2A is standing in the way of sensible regulation, then get rid of it. Then I’ll fight for reasonable laws around gun ownership. 2A is the problem.

      • @Madison420
        link
        21 year ago

        Bingo, license (no test just who you are where you live like a DL) register (every firearm) and own a fucking tank of you want, I don’t care. The biggest issue is you can pretty easily get ahold of one without anyone knowing you have one so the thought someone could get away is much more pervasive.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Not from the US but isn’t it like that US Citizens do not have to register their current place of living? If true I think they could get a grip of the gun madness by fixing that problem.

          They could couple permission for buying guns and ammo to have the buyer have a registered residency and showing their ID which would be checked against a federal database which logs the amount of guns and ammo bought.

          If a buyer is reaching some tresholds they’d have to ask for a permit and give some convincing reasons why they need them. Especially when they want to buy AR’s or other heavy weaponry.

          When set in effect, every US citizen has to register their current weapons. After a grace period, owning unregistered weapons and getting caught will get the buyer a ban for owning weapons and having to re-apply for permissions after some time. Getting caught multilple times is a perma ban.

          Every US citizen should have the right to buy guns and ammo to protect themselves even if they don’t have a permanent residency. Those could be allowed to buy a handgun, also logged in the federal DB with their ID or SSN.

          Everyone who wants a permit to buy guns needs to complete a training from a state agency.

          That long-ass plan for a better world would see the first major roadblock with the refusal to register their residency by at least 50% of the US-population, right? And it could also be that many left leaning, dems or libertarians would give that idea a hard pass.

          So yeah…probably every part of this plan collides with the US idea of individual freedom. Take a look at Switzerland maybe.

          • @Madison420
            link
            21 year ago

            Basically yes.

            That’s the idea. Not on ammo though, reloading is better for the environment so let’s not impede that.

            No. That’s a search, you can’t do that in the United States.

            That’s the idea.

            That’s the idea.

            Nope. You have to offer incentives to businesses so they want to make people do it or they won’t sell it, then it’s a business meeting a business decision not the government imposing it’s will. I mean it still is but most people over here are not huge on critical thinking.

            Probably, so you incentiveize it. Again then it’s people sneaking a couple dollars from the government, not the government imposing it’s will.

            Not really, people are just dumb and there’s a lot of money involved in keeping it controversial. You can literally watch profits of the big ammo manufacturers rise and fall every 4 -8 years they’re not going to let that go easily.

      • cannache
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Sensible regulations would be rubber bullets for newly minted firearms owners. Keep it empty, but if the day comes that you think about going on a mass shooting spree, you’ll probably change your mind when you remember that you’ll be loading rubber bullets and have to explain yourself after you’ve shot someone.

    • @SCB
      link
      10
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      when the right does finally manage a coup they’ll be the only ones with any guns you stupid motherfuckers

      Believe it or not, the US military has many guns.

        • @SCB
          link
          41 year ago

          The point here is that civilians aren’t going to defeat the US military, full stop. Whether sane people have guns or fascists have guns, only the military matters

          • @Riccosuave
            link
            -11 year ago

            Vietnam and Afghanistan would like to have a word with you about that…

            • @SCB
              link
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Might wanna check the actual combat statistics there bud. Shit Vietnam was also a professional, well-supplied army with a decade of combat experience against the French and massive infrastructure advantages.

              This is home turf, not foreign soil that’s attempting to be occupied peacefully. Plus, you’d have 50% of a country, give or take, readily willing to turn you in or attack you themselves, and 0 logistics infrastructure.

              It’s amazing to me this take is still common with people when it’s so easily laughed at.

              If you wanna go hide in the woods with your buddies, you can do that without trying to overthrow the government.

              • @Riccosuave
                link
                01 year ago

                I was responding to your previous point that a standing military is all that matters against an occupied civilian force. I don’t think that really bears up to scrutiny in historical terms.

                Also, I don’t know where you got off thinking I’m trying to LARP as a militia member, but nice strawman with absolutely zero background to support that conclusion…

                • @SCB
                  link
                  21 year ago

                  I don’t think that really bears up to scrutiny in historical term

                  Then, frankly, you’re wrong.

                  Also, I don’t know where you got off thinking I’m trying to LARP as a militia member

                  it was a generalized “you”

                  • @Riccosuave
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    Then, frankly, you’re wrong.

                    Cool, but you could have just said that initially without being kind of an asshole.

                    it was a generalized “you”

                    Well since you said it to me, how else was I supposed to take that.

                    Anyways, not mad at you. Was more just making a joke initially, but maybe in bad faith. Which, by the way, I was more than willing to admit.

            • cannache
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              I think the more important point is that people form militias to protect themselves, and carrying a weapon means considering bad thoughts and being aware of them, the same way that an ex drug user or addict practicing abstinence consistently needs to exert a degree of self discipline.

              If you ask me, owning a gun just makes violent assholes have a shorter fuse. Think about it, have you ever carried a stick or a knife and thought that carrying it meant something? Now you can be more assertive, but the risk of accidentally shooting people or just flying off the handle and shooting someone suddenly becomes a real risk.

              A great test would be to give recent licensed gun owners three rubber bullets to use. When you get around to firing it after losing your shit you’ll know that you really lost your cool.

            • wanderingmagus
              link
              -31 year ago

              We absolutely had the military capability to wipe Vietnam and Afghanistan off the goddamn map and delete their populations and wildlife from existence if ordered to do so. The politicians back home said no, and made us withdraw. We have thousands of nuclear reentry vehicles standing ready, and we are trained to set condition 1SQ when ordered, no questions asked, without knowing the target package. I challenge you to survive a hundred Hiroshimas per warhead, times several thousand.

              • @Riccosuave
                link
                English
                0
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                See my other comments below. I’m not looking to have an argument about nuclear war with a nuclear submariner. When you’re a hammer, everything looks like a nail and whatnot.

        • wanderingmagus
          link
          -11 year ago

          Military has equally as many progressives, moderates and centrists who absolutely will not tolerate these people. Source: I’m a submariner who works with nuclear weapons. You try something nutty, we can and will put your face into the concrete, no matter your political affiliation. Basics of the Personnel Reliability Program, the Command Managed Equal Opportunity Program, and Nuclear Weapons Security.

        • Montagge
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Bold words from someone that has the profile description

          I am a shitpost in human form: your mom loves me, mods fear me

          • @Riccosuave
            link
            131 year ago

            Seriously, can the mods please ban this person from this sub already…

            • @Hurts
              link
              31 year ago

              He’s been banned and (most) of the comments removed.

            • Montagge
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              I don’t know I’d call anyone stupid when you can’t even tell I’m not the person you were originally replying too

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      So… go buy a gun and shoot him myself? No thanks, voting is my weapon of choice and I use it like a machine gun