• @sfgifz
    link
    English
    161 year ago

    These accounts were initially locked for security reasons after signs of compromise, and we’re working to make contact with the account owners to ensure they have access

    Why not make it read-only until they make contact with the owners. Seems like an awfully convinient excuse otherwise.

    • @steventhedev
      link
      English
      -41 year ago

      Facebook are pretty upfront about the reasons for taking down accounts. It’s possible before they were detected they managed to upload some stuff that would get the account banned right away.

      • @MotoAsh
        link
        English
        101 year ago

        Oh, so some guy posts CP to Twitter, Twitter removes the post and reinstates the guy entirely … but it’s tooootally not suspicious when FB nukes an account from orbit for “signs” of being compromised…

        Yea, no. I call BS.

        • @steventhedev
          link
          English
          -91 year ago

          X (formerly known as Twitter) is a different company than Facebook. They have different policies.

          Facebook tend to be upfront about the reasons they removed an account. And they’ll ignore any and all evidence to the contrary after they’ve made that decision. There was a guy who hit the HN frontpage this week because he can’t advertise his online courses on Python and Pandas. Apparently they thought he was trying to sell live animals instead of teaching people how to do data science.

          Twitter just does whatever Musk wants this week.

          • @MotoAsh
            link
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Way to miss the point. They’re pretending to be up front. The real reason is the censorship you’re so adamantly denying.

            • @steventhedev
              link
              English
              -31 year ago

              Perhaps you can calm down and wait for eyeonpalestine to actually publish a statement before jumping to conclusions?