Nope it’s very easy, I select the Libertarian candidate usually. I have no regrets about my voting record because I don’t compromise my principles to vote for “the lesser evil” when non-evil options are available each time.
It’s an interesting question if supporting incremental change for the better is better or worse then throwing your vote away voting third party and that has to be a choice you make for yourself.
I did notice you completely ignored the second part of what I said so did you want to weigh in on that?
Nope it’s very easy, I select the Libertarian candidate usually. I have no regrets about my voting record because I don’t compromise my principles to vote for “the lesser evil” when non-evil options are available each time.
It’s an interesting question if supporting incremental change for the better is better or worse then throwing your vote away voting third party and that has to be a choice you make for yourself.
I did notice you completely ignored the second part of what I said so did you want to weigh in on that?
The second part didn’t have any merit worth responding to. You may refer to the Libertarian party platform for reference.
I’m impressed that you are self-aware enough to admit you aren’t able to respond to my comment.
Have a nice day!
I am able and I did respond, you’re just being a shithead now. Refer to the material that I referenced for your answer.
Personal attacks make for a very strong argument.
Why don’t you refer to the Lemmy terms of service about that one?
Whatever, you’re just here to argue pedantically so I’m done. If you want a block keep hassling me.
What does the Libertarian party platform say about suppressing someone’s free speech just because you disagree with it?
It says the government should never do that. Here is your block.