• @Whelks_chance
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is delivered in an entertaining way, but it has multiple issues within.

    For one, it’s delivered by a “beloved” UK institution of an entertainer, who has power and a podium. Insulting him as he asks would be largely pointless. It’s not a level playing field.

    He also utilises a number of straw men arguments throughout, without citation, so a decent chunk can be ignored as he’s arguing against a fictitious stance he’s created for comedic effect.

    Also, there’s a suggestion that an insult doesn’t carry weight, impact or importance. Which isn’t true. Again, insulting him would largely achieve very little, but that’s really not the case for most people, especially those who are already struggling in society.

    Allowing any arbitrary insult, especially in the widely visible and indefinitely indelible world of the internet, can have long, deep and destructive implications on those on the receiving end of them.

    Words have power, those who lie, deceive or misconstrue facts should be held to account for it.

    As Pratchett said, a lie can travel around the world before the truth can get it’s boots on.