I’d imagine they fake an American accent. Maybe Burbank, CA?

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    Americans repeatingly say this in the vague hope that if they say it enough times it will rewrite history and become true. There’s absolutely no evidence that that is the case.

    Realistically when you think about it it makes no sense, why would American English be closer to old English than British English? By the time of the colonisation no one spoke old English anymore anyway, so American English is no more likely to be like it than British English. Even if it was why would the current American form not have changed, if apparently the British form has changed?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      The study was from a college student in Canada. I’d wait to hear from peer reviews before taking one side or the other. Her findings were that Americans pronounce some words more closely to 17th century England vs. Common day England due to a movement to change the accent around that time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Key being some words

        Both have evolved, so it’s unsurprising that if you pick and choose your words American English is more similar to 17c English

        Iirc though the most similar are west country and a few accents from the southern states in the US, but they’ve evolved a lot too so they’re not most similar in every way

    • @ammonium
      link
      51 year ago

      It’s not unheard of, Icelandic is much closer to Old Norse than Norwegian is.

      There are many reasons why this could be the case: pure chance, less outside influence of other languages, a smaller group of people, …

      Not all of these apply to the US and I have no idea whether English in the US has less changed than in the UK.