• @FireTower
    link
    161 year ago

    This court case isn’t about automatic firearms it’s about semiautomatic firearms that exhibit listed features.

    This particular rulling also is only about if the law should be enforced while a the trial regarding it’s constitutionality ensues.

    • BaroqueInMind
      link
      fedilink
      -11 year ago

      Then the headline is wrong because semi-auto firearms are not federally defined as assault weapons.

      • @FireTower
        link
        111 year ago

        They’re operating off of the CA definition in the headline.

        To the best of my knowledge the only federal definition of the phrase ‘assault weapon’ came from the 1994 ban which ceased in 2004. And that targeted semiautomatic guns too as it was based off of California’s.