• WashedOver
    link
    fedilink
    811 months ago

    That’s a long way to say I don’t really know the details of this case and will just follow the narrative McDonald’s wants me to…

    • @dgmib
      link
      -311 months ago

      If you believe there are details about the case that I don’t understand, feel free to enlighten me.

      • @Krudler
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        McDonald’s had multiple incidents where they were ORDERED by courts to stop holding the coffee at an unsafe temperature, and they chose intentionally to disregard that.

        So McDonald’s chose to disregard human safety and legal orders. Hence the massive punitive fine.

        • @dgmib
          link
          111 months ago

          I am aware that McDonald’s did have 700 claims nationwide from burns from coffee in the 10 years between 1984 and 1994.

          But I can’t find anywhere where they were ordered by courts to lower the temperature. Can you provided a link to one of these cases where they were ordered to lower the temperature and they disregard that?

          • @Krudler
            link
            English
            011 months ago

            You seem quite interested in this topic, and I’m sure you’ll enjoy the process of continuing your research :-)

            • @MycoBro
              link
              111 months ago

              Sounds to me like you are just a shill for Burgerking…no…wait…Wendy’s. Yeah, your a fucking Wendy’s hand. I knew it.

              • @Krudler
                link
                English
                211 months ago

                I work at Sealion burger apparently