• hswolfdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

      • hswolfdeleted by creator
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            This same sentiment is echoed in the tech community around AI artwork and it’s, frankly, silly. You cannot blame a tool for being misused. You can say that only certain people should have ready access to a tool, and there are strict rules for the use of a tool, but at the end of the day, the tool bloody exists, saying “hey, can we just not use the tool, guys?” doesn’t work. Fix the people who have the most likelihood of misusing the tools, prevent access to the tool from unqualified people, and otherwise just accept that misuse is the price of advancement, as unfortunate as that is.

          • hswolfdeleted by creator
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            deleted by creator

            • Dkcecil91
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              I agree. This guy’s been all over this thread and all he’s really said is “wouldn’t it be better if nobody died?” Yeah of course it would. No one can argue with that and no one should argue with the poster above you because it isn’t productive at all.