• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    I don’t need any sources beyond the ones that I’m refuting. you can read their methodology and see that they’re flawed.

    • @jeffw
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      I did read it and, like thousands of others who have reviewed them, I agree with the methodology. I like you, who read an op ed from a beef industry insider and cling to it like religion because you don’t want to stop eating Big Macs.

        • @jeffw
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Then show me where you published your peer-reviewed response. Or show me somebody else’s. You can’t make a claim without evidence. I shared my evidence. Your turn

            • @jeffw
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              I’m dead. 0 sources to support your argument and misciting logical fallacies

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                you don’t seem to understand how scientific reasoning works and you just want to be right. I understand the cognitive dissonance might have driven you mad. maybe you should just take a break for a little while and come back and read this with fresh eyes when you can take the time to understand why poor nemechek use bad methodology and why it should not have been cited the thousands of times it has been since 2018. it has never been confirmed by a separate study.

                • @jeffw
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  One. Source. Please God. I gave you multiple and your argument is based on ONE. I’m asking for evidence, just like you did earlier.