Good. You’ll have plenty of reading to keep you busy. I’m still waiting for your sources where you refute Nemecek btw. To summarize, your arguments so far are the widely debunked “land for cattle feed can’t be used for human food or forests” and “Nemecek is inaccurate because I disagree with their math, despite the article being cited and confirmed by hundreds of other studies.”
poor nemechek is easy to refute. read it they attribute the water used to raise cotton for the textile industry as water used to produce beef. the methodology is fucked.
Tell me you didn’t read the study without telling me you didn’t read the study. This is hilarious and you can’t find one legitimate article backing you up
I did. You have your opinion, I have mine and the opinion of thousands of climate scientists. Let’s agree to disagree until you find a peer-reviewed source.
the article has been cited but it has never been confirmed. it can’t be because it makes no sense to attribute the weight from pressing soybeans for oil to the livestock industry when the livestock industry is only using the waste.
Good. You’ll have plenty of reading to keep you busy. I’m still waiting for your sources where you refute Nemecek btw. To summarize, your arguments so far are the widely debunked “land for cattle feed can’t be used for human food or forests” and “Nemecek is inaccurate because I disagree with their math, despite the article being cited and confirmed by hundreds of other studies.”
poor nemechek is easy to refute. read it they attribute the water used to raise cotton for the textile industry as water used to produce beef. the methodology is fucked.
Tell me you didn’t read the study without telling me you didn’t read the study. This is hilarious and you can’t find one legitimate article backing you up
poore nemecek supports what I’m saying.
Really? Can’t find a single source?
my source is poore-nemecek 2018
Which backs my claim bud. Show me the paper-reviewed criticism of it
the methodology is fucked. read it.
I did. You have your opinion, I have mine and the opinion of thousands of climate scientists. Let’s agree to disagree until you find a peer-reviewed source.
Fine, since you clearly are incapable of finding evidence, just copy and paste the quotes from their methodology that you don’t like.
the article has been cited but it has never been confirmed. it can’t be because it makes no sense to attribute the weight from pressing soybeans for oil to the livestock industry when the livestock industry is only using the waste.
Waiting for your evidence lol
80% of deforestation is for cattle feed. They don’t use waste
you’re just lying now. we know that cattle are fed silage which is waste and crop seconds.
Talk about lies. How’s that one source coming along?
my source is poore nemecek 2018.