• @LordKitsuna
    link
    341 year ago

    or you can be gnome, and “accept pull requests” by letting them stall for 8 years for no reason, refuse to elaborate, then claim your getting bullied when users get upset. that’s a solid third option

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I’m guessing you’re talking about something specific and if so could you link the pull requests or repository?

      • @LordKitsuna
        link
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s actually a few of them, but the most recent I can remember off the top of my head is probably the DRM leasing. That was a fun one. Everyone got together discussed how to do DRM leasing, gnome agreed and signed off on the implementation, stayed quiet for a long time, someone made a pull request for the agreed upon implementation, silence for a bit, and then all of a sudden “actually this implementation bad should be portal so nvm not doing it this way everyone else should change to use portals”

        ah right another was variable refresh https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1154 basically sat for 3 years with no review, and when users started being like hey we really need this what’s going on developers got all super defensive and ultimately locked it claiming harassment

        The comment about 8 years was a reference to the thumbnails in the file browser. If I recall correctly that one took about 8 years

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I do recall the thread linked and I think a few individuals whose sole purpose on the Gnome GitLab was insulting the Gnome maintainers were banned. Sometimes Gnome’s obsession with polish can be a double edged sword. I don’t think anyone on the Gnome team let’s merge requests die on purpose its just a lack of communication from them. Wish Gnome would take some risks with the DE with new features in the future.