So even if there were a similar amount of attacks using knives instead of guns (which isn’t the case as others pointed out), then guns would still be worse.
Yes gun kill more, but we don’t really have to stop at killing less people.
And the key to having even less people killed than just an effective gun control policy alone, is acknowledging that mental health does actually play a part. In a well functioning society people aren’t driven to mass murder to begin with.
Fundamentally I agree with you. Raising people who are mature enough to handle guns as well as other dangerous things in a responsible way would be ideal and would make restrictive laws superfluous. We currently see a similar process regarding cannabis laws in several western nations.
However, since we are far from having these necessary circumstances, more restrictive gun control laws are useful to save lives and prevent psychological damage. Meanwhile sure, go ahead and educate people.
Realistically, I currently don’t expect that we will have one day a society where we can trust each and every individual that much. This is why I think such laws will always be nececssary.
Apart from that, I don’t see a reason why anyone should posses tools, which are specifically designed to be efficient at killing, for private reasons. I could make an exception for sports. But why would any private person want or need a killing tool?
What are the mortality rates of those two weapons?
Disclaimer: I looked it up quickly and haven’t read a lot.
But from what I see, it’s far more likely to survive stabbing wounds than gunshot wounds. See, e.g., the collection of sources here: https://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/1997/02/24/knives-00006
So even if there were a similar amount of attacks using knives instead of guns (which isn’t the case as others pointed out), then guns would still be worse.
Yes gun kill more, but we don’t really have to stop at killing less people.
And the key to having even less people killed than just an effective gun control policy alone, is acknowledging that mental health does actually play a part. In a well functioning society people aren’t driven to mass murder to begin with.
Fundamentally I agree with you. Raising people who are mature enough to handle guns as well as other dangerous things in a responsible way would be ideal and would make restrictive laws superfluous. We currently see a similar process regarding cannabis laws in several western nations.
However, since we are far from having these necessary circumstances, more restrictive gun control laws are useful to save lives and prevent psychological damage. Meanwhile sure, go ahead and educate people.
Realistically, I currently don’t expect that we will have one day a society where we can trust each and every individual that much. This is why I think such laws will always be nececssary.
Apart from that, I don’t see a reason why anyone should posses tools, which are specifically designed to be efficient at killing, for private reasons. I could make an exception for sports. But why would any private person want or need a killing tool?