Plenty of orgs get caught when they don’t even pay for the the software on their computers. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find that the same entities not willing to pay a person to make artwork try to skip out on paying a business to generate it
Not really… sure you can run a1111/comfy locally but you’d still be bound by the terms of the Checkpoint finetunes and any LoRa’s you’ve used, and a lot of those are really sketchy about listing their sources.
Whose AI system are they using, and what did they pay for it? A lot of them do have clauses prohibiting commercial use of generated images
It’s called signing a contract and paying something. It’s used a lot nowadays.
Plenty of orgs get caught when they don’t even pay for the the software on their computers. I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find that the same entities not willing to pay a person to make artwork try to skip out on paying a business to generate it
It’s entirely possible they used Stable Diffusion locally, which means anything goes as long as it’s legal and is not harmful to any individuals.
Not really… sure you can run a1111/comfy locally but you’d still be bound by the terms of the Checkpoint finetunes and any LoRa’s you’ve used, and a lot of those are really sketchy about listing their sources.