What was the evidence against them? I’m curious due to:
“She had been trying to get back to her family for like two years,” Angel said. “…the doctor said she was fine to travel
“Rosalie’s attorney realized after that our intentions were pure of heart and the county is the one who made a mistake, not us,” Angel said.
While things could still be super-scammy and I by no means lean away from that, it would be really sad if the family was grifting and a good person (who happens to be a cop) got the stick due to media and echos (which does exist IMO just in a MUCH smaller way than on other sides).
I really wish the article gave more details on the specific arguments so readers could make a more informed determination.
“Neither Angel nor Martin were charged criminally in the matter, Sacramento District Attorney’s Office spokeswoman Shelly Orio said.”
I hate the typical lack of consequences for police doing criminal things.
What was the evidence against them? I’m curious due to:
While things could still be super-scammy and I by no means lean away from that, it would be really sad if the family was grifting and a good person (who happens to be a cop) got the stick due to media and echos (which does exist IMO just in a MUCH smaller way than on other sides).
I really wish the article gave more details on the specific arguments so readers could make a more informed determination.