“Bad” does have inherent value because one person’s “bad” Is another person’s “awesome.”
I think Gale is “bad” as she’s defining it because he’s boring and his squishy ass kept getting curb-stomped when I tried to use him. I also hate the way he tries to romance you and the incel vibes I got of him. But go on tumblr and folks just adore him and his romance. What makes him “bad” to me is a selling point to others. That’s what I think the writer is trying to say.
No, it’s not even close.
He’s claiming being “bad” has inherent value. It’s a terrible, incoherent article presenting an absurdly stupid opinion.
“Bad” does have inherent value because one person’s “bad” Is another person’s “awesome.”
I think Gale is “bad” as she’s defining it because he’s boring and his squishy ass kept getting curb-stomped when I tried to use him. I also hate the way he tries to romance you and the incel vibes I got of him. But go on tumblr and folks just adore him and his romance. What makes him “bad” to me is a selling point to others. That’s what I think the writer is trying to say.
No. That’s entirely nonsensical.
You’re looking for substance that doesn’t exist. There isn’t a shred of merit anywhere in that article.
Ok bro. I’ve had basically seven shots of gin and am drink to argue. You enjoy your win on this point or whatever; I’m drunk whee
It sounds like you just didn’t know how to play a wizard. Gale is one of the most powerful companions in the game.