• MxM111
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Netanyahu does not state that killing of civilians is his goal, nor does IDF purposely do that. Imagine the amount of civilian deaths if it were actually IDF’s goal, as it is for Hamas.

        • @DanL4
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          Israeli military is not for volunteers, it’s for everyone. The top ranking generals and chiefs of staff were prominent against Netanyahu and this extremist incompetent government. They are also said that human rights activists that give a voice to solders that saw atrocious acts of the idf itself. This is not the norm, contrary to what the media would have you think. This, according to the top ranking Israeli ex officers, is how the idf should fix its wrongs.

        • @assassin_aragorn
          link
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They bombed a refugee camp. Twice.

          If I were a military commander in WW2 with the same technology we have today, and Hitler was out in the open at an elementary school graduation next to a preschool, I would not make that order. Instead, I’d mobilize intelligence agents to get there immediately and tail him, while moving my forces nearby.

          I find it hard to believe that Israeli military and intelligence agencies could not track him and wait. The IDF just cares more about their own skin than they do of Palestinian children.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -41 year ago

            It took the US 10 years to track down Bin Laden, all the while he was still communicating with cells. In your example that is a LOT of quality holocaust time for Hitler.

            There is no easy way out of the trolley problem of slippery genocidal targets popping up with a limited time window to execute.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      This is an important distinction in my opinion. Does the IDF care if they kill palestinian civilians? No. But they aren’t actively trying to murder as many palestinian civilians as they can either.

      • @Plopp
        link
        English
        271 year ago

        Being so incredibly nonchalant about killing civilians as the IDF is it’s almost an insignificant difference imo.

      • ???
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        They aren’t? So why did they bomb Jabalia twice?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How should I know. What I do know however is that if the IDF wanted, they could kill many more Gazans.

          • ???
            link
            English
            181 year ago

            Seriously look at their actions and decide for yourself whether or not they are going out of their way to kill civilians or whether they are so careless they kill anyone on their way

            The idea that the IDF would have to beat Gaza into a pulp so we can finally admit to ourselves that they don’t care about civilians is weak, not to mention a logical fallacy. This isn’t the indication to look for when war crimes happen. It’s the actions of the IDF themselves.

            Just look at all the times Israel told civilians to move to one place them bombed the shit out of the place.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Maybe they just want plausible deniability more than they want immediate genocide. It sure looks to me like that’s what they’re doing, and that it’s working.

        • @Earthwormjim91
          link
          English
          -31 year ago

          Because Hamas has used it as a base for decades…

          Just like every other piece of civilian infrastructure.

          You say Jabalia like it hasn’t been a city since the 40s. It’s not some tent city. It’s a legitimate city that has been around for decades, which Hamas only took control of after 2007.

          • ???
            link
            English
            111 year ago

            Yes totally, that is enough excuse to shoot dead over a hundred people and wound hundreds more.

            Tents or not, you’re basically saying Israel bombed a crowded area and I’m afraid they are losing this one in the media. 😊

            It’s a refugee camp because people who live there are more victims of Israeli displacement.

            • @Earthwormjim91
              link
              English
              -81 year ago

              It’s not a refugee camp at all. It’s a city that has existed for almost a century.

              You can cheer for Hamas. Your emojis don’t mean shit lol. Nobody else supports them. Even “the media” (you sound like my drug addicted religious dad here).

              • @davepleasebehave
                link
                English
                201 year ago

                what a shill. no where did the above comment support Hammas.

              • ???
                link
                English
                14
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                First, I didn’t cheer for Hamas.

                Also, That area is still a refugee camp. You are confusing Jabalia city with the Jabalia refugee camp.. It’s okay to be wrong, you just have to admit it to yourself.

                And the very fact that somehow bombing people taking refuge in a city rather than a refigee camp is something you needed to point out as though that changes anything … That’s very telling.

                And lastly, Israel is losing the media war. 😊 It’s not sustainable to kill more people and get away with it, not when even holocaust historians are alarmed at the Israeli rhetoric and massacre it keeps committing on a daily basis.

                • @steventhedevOP
                  link
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Jabalia Refugee Camp was established in 1948.

                  It’s not a temporary housing measure. The buildings are all high-density multi-family dwellings constructed from reinforced concrete.

                  Calling it a refugee camp cheapens the word for people who are displaced from their homes and forced into temporary housing during a war.

                  • ???
                    link
                    English
                    21 year ago

                    It’s still a refugee camp. It houses refugees who have been displaced. Many Palestinian refugee camps are X number of years old because Israel has been ethnically cleansing them for decades. It doesn’t matter how you define it, no one “made shit up”, it’s classed as a refugee camp. The UN set it up as a camp, but here comes some random regular jackoff on lemmy trying to tell us otherwise.

                    The audacity of pro-Israelis in twisting all international definitions is beyond me.

                    Again, the very fact that it’s been a refugee camp for decades where people have shitty living conditions makes this bombing that Israel did worse, not better.

          • ???
            link
            English
            101 year ago

            Exactly. Israel bombed a giant refugee camp. How is this helping Israel’s case?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                51 year ago

                Well, I, for one, hope that the IDF is finally fucking losing the popularity war. Until the US stops propping them up no matter what, they have no incentive to seriously work towards peace.

                If they were fighting an actual war, then the leaders of Israel would be pulled into the ICC for war crimes.