The Israeli army fired artillery shells containing white phosphorus, an incendiary weapon, in military operations along Lebanon’s southern border between 10 and 16 October 2023.

  • @galloog1
    link
    English
    -31 year ago

    You want me to cite a source that says that you are allowed to conduct collateral damage and attack supply lines while at war? That burden of proof is still on you. Nothing in the Geneva Conventions forbids it.

    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.34_AP-I-EN.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi524K1oqWCAxU5lGoFHcJQCt0QFnoECDYQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2_QT30xBqnzFxMi476FkEu

    • Annoyed_🦀
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      You:

      Israel is at war. Collective punishment is no longer a relevant claim.

      Also you:

      You want me to cite a source that says that you are allowed to conduct collateral damage and attack supply lines while at war?

      Be sure not to hurt your back moving goal post like that.

      Also:

      Article 75 — Fundamental guarantees

      1. The following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever, whether committed by civilian or by military agents:

      a) violence to the life, health, or physical or mental well-being of persons, in particular:

      i) murder;

      d) collective punishments;

      Maybe go eat a sandwich or something, i’m done with your tantrum.

      • @galloog1
        link
        English
        -21 year ago

        Collateral damage is not collective punishment.

        Collateral damage is acceptable when targeting legal targets.

        Targets are only legal in a time of war.

        Something tells me you don’t do this for a living.

          • @galloog1
            link
            English
            -21 year ago

            What’s more likely, Israel is a nation state troll with multiple western security apparatuses in support or there’s at least a scheme of logic that people who actually look at the data can look at?

            It’s funny because everyone I know that is liberal and left who work in national security break with the rest of their demographic and you see it in the Democratic party establishment as well. I’ve never seen a more clear line between experts who work on the space and those that do not.