If the permit is easy to get then how will it stop a psycho from getting one and then poisoning people? Also, how often do we hear about people poisoning homeless people? I’m sorry, but to me, there is not a legitimate reason for the permit and is instead a clear attempt to starve the homeless out of town. I also have doubts that it’s even constitutional.
Food poisoning also exist. In any case, I’m trying to give a logical reason for having a permit. It’s all hypocritical, cause I know for a fact you’re not going out to feed the homeless, so get off your high horse
If the permit is easy to get then how will it stop a psycho from getting one and then poisoning people? Also, how often do we hear about people poisoning homeless people? I’m sorry, but to me, there is not a legitimate reason for the permit and is instead a clear attempt to starve the homeless out of town. I also have doubts that it’s even constitutional.
With a permit you can track who is distributing food and track it’s safety
Again, where are the cases of people poisoning food they give to homeless. You’re justifying a law by presenting a problem that doesn’t exist.
https://www.cbsnews.com/losangeles/news/man-sentenced-to-4-years-in-prison-for-poisoning-several-homeless-individuals-recording-their-reactions/
Food poisoning also exist. In any case, I’m trying to give a logical reason for having a permit. It’s all hypocritical, cause I know for a fact you’re not going out to feed the homeless, so get off your high horse
You literally know nothing about me but nice try lmfao
Edit: that’s la not Shawnee
I know you aren’t feeding the homeless, I know that