• @[email protected]English
    8•1 year ago

    There hasn’t been any anti-capitalist revolutions in the last 150 year.

    Maybe read a history book?

    I seems to recall the US losing a war to communists in the 1970s for instance.

    • @[email protected]
      0•1 year ago

      any

      I don’t think their point was that no revolution has happened but the revolution to change it all didn’t happen like he assumed

      • @[email protected]
        1•1 year ago

        Marx didn’t consider capitalists holding the world hostage with nuclear weapons

        plenty of successful revolutions did occur though, just not in places under the control of the ‘west’

        very chauvinistic view to hold IMO

        • @[email protected]
          0•1 year ago

          I mean the world revolution was already sorta stopped before nukes came into play. Maybe next time though, never say never

    • @Zoboomafoo
      -1•1 year ago

      The US lost a war to Vietnamese nationalists that adopted the trappings of Communism in order to get materiel support from China. They rejected it, and China, as soon as possible

        • @Zoboomafoo
          0•1 year ago

          The economy of Vietnam is a developing mixed socialist-oriented market economy

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Vietnam

          That doesn’t sound very communist to me, and I’ve heard plenty of times that a mixed economy isn’t a socialist one at all.

          Or is that only when it’s a European country?

          • @[email protected]
            2•1 year ago

            the Revolution hasn’t happened

            conclusion first, then cherry picked the points in history that supported his conclusion

            you hear those self-aware wolves howling?