@[email protected] to BreadTubeEnglish • edit-218 days agoDeletedgoogle.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down13cross-posted to: breadtubebreadtube4chanbreadtubebreadtube[email protected][email protected]beantestcommunitylemmyshitpost
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkDeletedgoogle.com@[email protected] to BreadTubeEnglish • edit-218 days agomessage-square5fedilinkcross-posted to: breadtubebreadtube4chanbreadtubebreadtube[email protected][email protected]beantestcommunitylemmyshitpost
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoHmm… Should I make it clearer that this is an LGBT person’s response to Matt Walsh, and not the Matt Walsh video itself
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish0•edit-21 year agoNot allowing his face to be prominently exposed would be the purest ideal. Otherwise, perhaps mark a post as NSFW, so the image would be displayed as blurred.
Let me ask my dog.
Hmm… Should I make it clearer that this is an LGBT person’s response to Matt Walsh, and not the Matt Walsh video itself
No, I got it. Thanks.
Not allowing his face to be prominently exposed would be the purest ideal.
Otherwise, perhaps mark a post as NSFW, so the image would be displayed as blurred.