Can be extended to self-driving cars that need to “decide”, who they rather run over.

  • @teejay
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Radiolab did a great episode on this very topic.

    It gets really interesting when you think about the clash of corporate greed in this area. It’s not hard to imagine car companies selling you a premium option (or worse, subscriptions) where the car will make decisions prioritizing your life and safety over people outside, even if it’s multiple people who would get maimed or killed to keep the driver safe.

    • @DamaskoxOP
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      At least I’d hope that they informed the driver/car owner about the AI system in their car and - if it so is - that The AI could decide against their life.
      Then they “just” need to decide is it worth it to get such a car with such an AI system or not.

      Not telling them that their car has such an AI would be unethical, to say the least.

      • @teejay
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Sure. Buried in some cryptic legalese in paragraph 3 on page 400 in 1 of 8 different EULAs that the car owner had to accept when first buying the car.

        • @DamaskoxOP
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Not made easy 😬