• @neeshie
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Yeah. Glad you noticed. Would you say the Viet Cong and the ANC weren’t justified?

    • BaldProphet
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      I’m not sure what the ANC is, but the Viet Cong were absolutely not justified in their actions. They were part of an attempt to force communism on South Vietnam. In effect, they used force of arms in lieu of democracy to get what they wanted. They committed atrocities and were unjustified in their actions.

      Any group that rejects political and democratic solutions to its problems in favor of violence is unjustified. Violence is a last resort.

      • @neeshie
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Any group that rejects political and democratic solutions to its problems in favor of violence is unjustified.

        Nice, we should have just voted the Nazis out then. Algeria and Vietnam should have just voted out the colonial powers. The ANC should have just voted out South African apartheid. Violence is a last resort sure, and Palestinians (along with those other groups) are at a point where they have to turn to it.

        • BaldProphet
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Way to completely ignore what I actually wrote.

          Resorting to violence when democracy fails is different to outright rejecting democracy and going straight for violence, which is what Hamas and other Islamist terror groups in that region do. Hamas (and, I guess all Palestinians, since you’re lumping them together?) have rejected political solutions to their conflict with Israel because they do not desire to coexist, they want to eject all Israeli Jews from the region, or, if possible, slaughter them. They don’t desire peace. They desire war and terror and the genocide of the Jews.

          • @neeshie
            link
            English
            01 year ago

            I guess all Palestinians, since you’re lumping them together?

            There’s a difference between saying that all Palestinians are Hamas and saying that the only option Palestinians have left is violence.

            Resorting to violence when democracy fails is different to outright rejecting democracy and going straight for violence, which is what Hamas and other Islamist terror groups in that region do.

            Can you explain how you expect them to negotiate with Israel peacefully when Israel has shown that it is not interested in peace by continuing to build illegal settlements in the west bank, effectively killing a two state solution? They can’t peacefully protest, they’d get shot. They can’t vote Israel out, they aren’t citizens of Israel. The only options left for them is violence. And out of the organizations there, the secular ones like the PFLP and DFLP aren’t as powerful as they used to be so Hamas is the only viable one left.

            If there was a way for Palestinians to achieve liberation peacefully, that would be awesome for everyone, but I’m struggling to see how that’s possible.

            • BaldProphet
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Hamas killed the two-state solution. Israel bent over backwards to try to compromise with and accommodate the Palestinians, which it had no legal obligation to do, and Hamas and its ilk rejected those offers because they didn’t want two states–they wanted one state, sans Jews.

              I’m not a fan of what Israel has been doing in the West Bank, but don’t lie to me and act like those actions are why a two-state solution isn’t working. Palestine didn’t want to exist in a world that included Israel.

              • @neeshie
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                don’t lie to me and act like those actions are why a two-state solution isn’t working.

                Do you understand how it makes a 2 state solution physically impossible? That’s Israel’s doing. You can’t have a solution that displaces 700,000 people, so you can’t have a 2 state solution.

                Israel has never offered a solution that gave Palestinians a right to return. The people displaced in the Nakba and later, and the people born into refugee camps, deserve this right. Israel’s proposed peace solutions are all garbage and unfair, and it is insane to expect Palestinians to be ok with making huge compromises regarding land that they were cleansed from.

                they wanted one state, sans Jews.

                Hamas? Sure. But don’t pretend that the various secular organizations wanted to ethnically cleanse jews from the area, they didn’t. They supported a secular state solution.

                • BaldProphet
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  Well then, they should oust Hamas and the Palestinian Authority. Then they can return to the bargaining table, but they shouldn’t expect to receive the same generous concessions that were offered previously, imo. I don’t see Israel being so willing to put its national security up for compromise as it did before.

                  • @neeshie
                    link
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    they shouldn’t expect to receive the same generous concessions that were offered previously

                    Cmon dude. The deals offered were not generous. They were bullshit and insulting. Israel has left them with only one option, violence. It really fucking sucks, and innocent people are dying, but it’s because Israel doesn’t want peace, not because the Palestinians don’t.