• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -20
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    [Citation needed.]

    And no, Al Jazeera doesn’t count.

    Edit: Lol, lot’s of downvotes - and not a single person providing proof for a policy of ethnic cleansing that’s not coming from a literal anti-Israel propaganda outlet (or even from the propaganda outlet). You guys sure you aren’t just being antisemitic? Because you don’t seem to have any real ground to stand on.

    • bobalotOP
      link
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How about publications like Vox (who in turn refer to publications like the Jerusalem Times and Haretz).

      Must be anti-Isreal propaganda as well.

      https://www.vox.com/23910085/netanyahu-israel-right-hamas-gaza-war-history

      In 2017, Israeli far-right parliamentarian Bezalel Smotrich proposed what he termed a “decisive plan” to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

      Smotrich, who is now serving as finance minister in Netanyahu’s cabinet, argued (correctly) that the root of the conflict was competing claims to the same land from two distinct national groups. But, unlike his centrist peers, Smotrich claimed that these ambitions were incommensurable: that no territorial compromise could ever be reached between Israelis and Palestinians. In such a zero-sum conflict, one side has to win and the other has to lose.

      The key to Israel winning such a total victory, he wrote, is simple: Break the Palestinians’ spirit.

      “Terrorism derives from hope — a hope to weaken us,” Smotrich argued. “The statement that the Arab yearning for national expression in the Land of Israel cannot be ‘repressed’ is incorrect.”

      Doing this, he continued, begins by annexing the West Bank and rapidly expanding Jewish settlements there. Once Israel has declared its intention to never let that land go, and created realities on the ground that make its withdrawal unimaginable, the Palestinians will reconcile themselves to the new reality — accept a second-class form of citizenship, leave voluntarily, or attempt violent resistance and be crushed.

      Smotrich has used his time in Netanyahu’s cabinet to try to implement this plan — working both to de facto annex the West Bank and to rapidly expand Jewish settlement. The result has been the exact opposite of what Smotrich thought would happen: Atrocities by emboldened settler extremists ignited Palestinian anger. Atrocities committed by Palestinians led to settler retaliation, creating an unstable situation requiring a significant redeployment of Israel Defense Forces resources to the West Bank — whose raids themselves became a source of Palestinian grievance.

      Why believe Netanyahu’s cabinet Ministers when they openly speak of ethnic cleansing and destroying any chance of a Palestinian state?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        That’s a significantly better source, thank you. But I’m still not seeing genocide. The ramblings of one cabinet minister in a coalition government don’t make something government policy. The only thing that Israel is actually doing is expanding its settlements, which is bad because it makes a two-state solution less likely, but it’s not genocidal.