• @jimbolauski
    link
    -31 year ago

    So you’ve shifted from his manifesto not being littered with CRT ideology to the police will not confirm that the journal is authentic.

    • @PizzaMan
      link
      61 year ago

      No, I still hold the position that the right wing is using CRT as a boogeyman, and an unconfirmed manifesto (that doesn’t even having anything to do with CRT, let alone being littered with it) in no way supports your claim.

      • @jimbolauski
        link
        -21 year ago

        It’s pretty obvious you can’t or won’t read his manifesto.

        • @PizzaMan
          link
          51 year ago

          Yeah, it’s almost like I don’t want to lend any credence to terrorists/terrorist orgs.

          • @jimbolauski
            link
            -31 year ago

            Yet you can claim to know what’s in it without reading it.

            • @PizzaMan
              link
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              If your water stops working in your bathroom, but you still have water pressure in other parts of the house. Without looking in the pipes, is it wrong to say that there is a clog?

              Even though you never looked?

              I never claimed to know what’s in Hale’s manifesto if there actually is one, and I don’t need to because I know what leads to a metaphorical clog, and CRT ain’t it.

              • @jimbolauski
                link
                -11 year ago

                The only way to know if water stopped working in your bathroom is to observe it you have to look. Further bathrooms have shutoffs, it’s far more likely the shutoff was enabled. Water pipes getting clogged in a specific area is very uncommon so it would be wrong to think your pipes are clogged. It looks like you know as much about plumbing as the manifesto.

                • @PizzaMan
                  link
                  31 year ago

                  It’s a metaphor. If you can’t even try to understand what I’m saying then I don’t know what to tell you.

                  • @jimbolauski
                    link
                    -11 year ago

                    It’s a terrible metaphor. Claiming knowledge about something without ever seeing it is impossible.

          • ThrowawayOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -71 year ago

            You’ve said over and over that you want to better understand conservatives, then you say stuff like this. You also whine that you can’t just defeat the point of the sub by posting lefty shit.

            Do you honestly want to understand, or is that just an excuse?

            • @PizzaMan
              link
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You’ve said over and over that you want to better understand conservatives

              No I haven’t. I understand conservatism plenty. It’s all about fighting literally anything that would make the world better, more empathetic, more prosperous, more fair, and actively pushing for regression and death of humanity.

              I’m not here to understand conservatism better. I’m here to stay in the loop, keep my debate skills in check, a bit of entertainment, and on the off chance a fence sitter is passing by, hopefully enough context for them to see through conservative bullshit.