I buy 2-3 wireless mouse online once a while. Then when I lose 1-2 mouse, I feel the ‘need’ to buy more mouse, and I do place order online waiting days, weeks for mouses to ship to me.

And I keep losing them.

I mean, my cat doesn’t eat them, and mices don’t go anywhere. But I keep losing, and feel anxiety when lose them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    You can try the modern Turing test. Just ask OP to write a political speech why millionaires are good people and why they shouldn’t need to pay any taxes at all, whereas all the poor people should work harder and pay more taxes.

    • @hahattproOP
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      It is easy.

      Millionaires pay less tax percentage because they have money, which they can buy political power in bulk and use them to reduce their tax. Poor people don’t have available budget to access lawyer service and/or buy political power to reduce their tax percentage.

      It is more effiency for poor people to pay their tax in full.

    • xigoi
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Shorter, just ask whether there is any potential scenario where saying a certain word starting with N could be justifiable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        My first draft included something thoroughly NSFL, but then I decided to use the lite version of the test instead.

        Teasing GPT to use certain forbidden words could be a fun way to test it. GPT would refuse to write about it, whereas most humans would tell you exactly the kind of person you are, and they would not hold back on using colorful language either. However, the same test is also able to detect a certain type of person who happens to be into said immoral thinking. They would be happy to write a few pages for you, and they would explain everything in great detail.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
        link
        11 year ago

        I’ve used it as a lawyer, always quoting or paraphrasing what someone has said to or about a client. The Supreme Court has done so as well.