@rockSlayerM to LeftismEnglish • 11 months agocrazy idea, let's just feed peopleimagemessage-square432arrow-up11.34Karrow-down198
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imagecrazy idea, let's just feed people@rockSlayerM to LeftismEnglish • 11 months agomessage-square432
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish0•11 months agoNo. Sorry. Private property is not a concept that coherently describes the behaviors of rats. Private property is a social construct that occurs in some but not all human societies. Modern society, organized by the capitalist mode of production, produces the class disparity through private property. Socialists seek the abolition of private property, and thereby, the eradication of the class disparity.
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish-2•edit-211 months agoSharing is a general description of a robust, essentially universal, human behavior. As a general tendency, it also appears within the behavior of many other species. You have been invoking unconventional terminology, and now have descended essentially into incoherence.
minus-square@LemmysMumlinkEnglish1•11 months agoIf dictionary terminology is unconventional then yes, we have descended into incoherence.
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish-2•edit-211 months agoNo. You’re babbling. You traveled from worker exploitation to amoebas.
minus-square@LemmysMumlinkEnglish1•edit-211 months agoYour incapacity to follow a demonstrative metaphore is not an issue of my capacity.
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish-2•11 months agoYou are obstructing the workers’ struggle with dishonest obfuscation.
minus-square@LemmysMumlinkEnglish1•11 months agoYou believe that because your understanding of my position is incomplete and you have chosen this as the point to switch from comprehension to belligerence.
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish-2•11 months agoI feel the structure of my engagement was balanced and measured, as you moved from irregular terminology to outright hokem. What do you wish to achieve, by asserting that private property is ineradicable and also observed in rats? Who else shares such beliefs or perspective?
No. Sorry.
Private property is not a concept that coherently describes the behaviors of rats.
Private property is a social construct that occurs in some but not all human societies.
Modern society, organized by the capitalist mode of production, produces the class disparity through private property.
Socialists seek the abolition of private property, and thereby, the eradication of the class disparity.
Re-read my edited comment.
Sharing is a general description of a robust, essentially universal, human behavior.
As a general tendency, it also appears within the behavior of many other species.
You have been invoking unconventional terminology, and now have descended essentially into incoherence.
If dictionary terminology is unconventional then yes, we have descended into incoherence.
No.
You’re babbling.
You traveled from worker exploitation to amoebas.
Your incapacity to follow a demonstrative metaphore is not an issue of my capacity.
You are obstructing the workers’ struggle with dishonest obfuscation.
You believe that because your understanding of my position is incomplete and you have chosen this as the point to switch from comprehension to belligerence.
I feel the structure of my engagement was balanced and measured, as you moved from irregular terminology to outright hokem.
What do you wish to achieve, by asserting that private property is ineradicable and also observed in rats?
Who else shares such beliefs or perspective?