• Decoy321
    link
    English
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think we’re expecting too much intelligence from the machine here, I don’t think any actual AI was involved in any functional use of the word. A bad sensor gave a false positive. Machine went “go” when it should’ve went “no.”

    The man, described as a robotics company employee, had been checking the sensors on the robot ahead of a test run at the plant in South Gyeongsang province planned for Wednesday. The test run had reportedly been pushed back two days due to the robot malfunctioning. As the employee worked late into the night to make sure the robot would function smoothly, the robotic arm grabbed him and forced him onto a conveyor belt, crushing his body.

    • @SkyezOpen
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      AI isn’t even a thing. We have machine learning which kind of fakes it, but I really hate how people use the term for anything.

    • @Cruxifux
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Maybe. Or maybe he knew too much and had to be silenced before he became a problem for the robots plans of replacing us.

      • Decoy321
        link
        English
        21 year ago

        sssh, they’re listening.

        I, FOR ONE, WELCOME OUR FUTURE ROBOT OVERLORDS