• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1111 months ago

    Google’s position is that it was concerned about losing games on Play, but that there’s nothing nefarious about that. “We just wanted developers to choose Play,” Kochikar said in testimony — particularly when Apple’s iOS was an alternative. And getting games on the service, Koh testified, “was the investment we thought was worth all the dollars.”

    Conversely, Epic is using these documents to argue that Google feared competition for Android app distribution and has maintained its Play store as an unlawful monopoly. This deal’s existence doesn’t prove that — but at the very least, it’s an interesting look at how Google sees its games business.

    Kind of sounds like they’re arguing the same point?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      The framing is different.

      Google: we want to encourage developers to use our solution instead of competitors, that totally exist and developers are free to use whatever they want

      Epic: Google has a monopoly and they are trying to keep it that way and prevent competitors to come

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        It absolutely makes sense. There are people that will make their Android vs iPhone purchasing decision based on which platform “has Fortnite” (in it’s in the default app store that people actually use).

    • @Holyginz
      link
      English
      211 months ago

      I can actually see both sides on this one. Google views it as simply having it available on their store and nothing else, where epic views it as Google wanting a piece of every pie there is. Can’t really say who I side with here.