When it comes to age on the ballot, Texas didn’t wait until 2024 to weigh in.

Asked to let judges stay on the bench until they’re 79 years old — a year younger than President Joe Biden — Texas voters soundly rejected the proposal in Tuesday’s elections, a defeat that drew new attention to issues of age and fitness for office in the U.S.

“Age is front of mind for American voters in a way that it has not traditionally been and they are nervous about it,” said Cal Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University.

Others cautioned against broader takeaways. At least four other states have rejected similar proposals over the last decade, according to the National Center for State Courts. And states that have passed the measures have mostly done so in close votes.

    • be_excellent_to_each_other
      link
      fedilink
      -31 year ago

      Don’t make policy based on outliers.

      The way to avoid that, and to respect individual differences, is with standardized periodic testing, which I would support for sure.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Of course, standardized testing. Thats never failed categorically to assess entire generations on a grand sweeping scale.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yes. Every time, 100%, yes.

            You shouldnt be in power at that age. Your body is either failing, beginning fail, or could fail within minutes.

            Lets even set aside the massive mental degredation, of which the outliers are few and far far far between. Hows your heart? Your liver? Your thyroid? How many politicians have to have sneaky hidden surgeries and procedures to hide their failing bodies from the public? (Spoiler, its a lot)

            These people are supposed to lead nations. Thats like trusting the lead sled dog pulling life saving supplies across the tundras of the north to the 20 year old husky who is missing an eye and a hind leg.

            This isnt even about disabilities. You cannot out-fit the passage of time. Your body cant out juke aging. And we know the human limits are sputtering out by that point regardless of your natural levels of ability.

            They. Dont. Need. That. Power. They need to retire, care for their health, and enjoy their final years. They dont need to hoard power like some pathetic sniveling dragon guarding a pile of gold.

            The only reason we dont have that no brainer limit already is because the walking mummies arent willing to give up their thrones. Because they crave power. Which is proof they do not deserve it, and need to go.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                41 year ago

                How do you establish competency when the people you are measuring are the people putting the test on, grading it, choosing its metrics, and who define competency as “the thing Im doing right now, thank you very much”?

                Youre arguing for a vapid ideal that relies on politicians to not be politicians while they appraise themselves and one another.

                You basically want to give them a political cudgel to weaponize against political enemies because the concept gives you the warm and fuzzies.

                • be_excellent_to_each_other
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -21 year ago

                  How do you establish competency when the people you are measuring are the people putting the test on, grading it, choosing its metrics, and who define competency as “the thing Im doing right now, thank you very much”?

                  So we don’t have ANYONE under your arbitrary line with enough experience and power to set such competency standards? No one at all?

                  Youre arguing for a vapid

                  On second thought, fuck you.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    31 year ago

                    This would be a law. Politicians make, set, and edit laws.

                    Anyone put into place could and would be replaced by politicians who wanted to make sure they pass the test.

                    Youre relying on human failibility, and emotional weight. Your last sentence reinforcing that.

                    You know what cant be bribed, blackmailed, or replaced by a politician without the public noticing? A hard line defined by the passage of time.

                    But youve clearly run out of reasons to back your idea.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                I think we all like that idea better. In an ideal world. In reality, it just doesn’t work.