BarterClubM to AntiworkEnglish • 1 year agoFry cooksi.imgur.comimagemessage-square443fedilinkarrow-up11.49Karrow-down135
arrow-up11.46Karrow-down1imageFry cooksi.imgur.comBarterClubM to AntiworkEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square443fedilink
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish-1•edit-21 year agoYour point is that if you needed surgery, then you would want it performed other than by a cook with a dirty spatula. Your point is meaningless. No one suggested that someone performing surgery would not be properly trained.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoThat wasn’t my point because i didn’t say that. I was explaining that the person who did was only describing how having more or less skill is true using that scenario.
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish0•1 year agoSkill is not a quantity. You identified as a quantity duration of time invested training. You conflated an item with one of its attributes.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•edit-21 year agoYou can have a quantity of skill. Skill is not a requirement for justice, nor is it something that should be denied from workers.
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish0•1 year agoSkill is not a quantity, nor is it quantifiable, and your further objection embodies a straw man attack.
minus-square@unfreeradicallinkEnglish1•1 year agoDoes an apprentice in a trade have more skill or less in his trade than a master in another trade? Again, skills differ qualitatively. At best one may conceive as a quantity a particular kind of skill, but not skill generally.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoOk, you concede skill can be quantified and compared. People can also have more skills than others. And, yes, generally.
Your point is that if you needed surgery, then you would want it performed other than by a cook with a dirty spatula.
Your point is meaningless.
No one suggested that someone performing surgery would not be properly trained.
That wasn’t my point because i didn’t say that. I was explaining that the person who did was only describing how having more or less skill is true using that scenario.
Skill is not a quantity.
You identified as a quantity duration of time invested training.
You conflated an item with one of its attributes.
You can have a quantity of skill.
Skill is not a requirement for justice, nor is it something that should be denied from workers.
Skill is not a quantity, nor is it quantifiable, and your further objection embodies a straw man attack.
Apprentice, tradesman, journeyman, master.
Does an apprentice in a trade have more skill or less in his trade than a master in another trade?
Again, skills differ qualitatively.
At best one may conceive as a quantity a particular kind of skill, but not skill generally.
Ok, you concede skill can be quantified and compared. People can also have more skills than others. And, yes, generally.
No. You are dishonest.