His win is a direct result of the Supreme Court’s decision in a pivotal LGBTQ+ rights case.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    Ok, so let’s hope that the supreme court agrees with you and draws the line at taxi drivers. Because today they let photographers discriminate you and tomorrow they can decide that the rules for doctors are unconstitutional.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      I understand your fear. But my opinion isn’t going to impact that crooked group. It’s not like I voted for them. Whatever is gonna happen is gonna happen regardless of what you or I do. We’re all fucked. I may as well be allowed to legally discriminate against the people who can legally discriminate against me. 🤷‍♂️

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -21 year ago

      Do you really want a doctor treat you who despises you? Can you still trust them to do their best?

      The real problem lies deeper than this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        So where you live doctors just let people suffer/die if they don’t like them and it’s ok? You don’t have any oversight, expert panels, ethics boards, investigations? That’s wild.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          You don’t think there’s a range between doing the bare minimum and giving your best? I don’t say they let you die, or send you away. I said I wouldn’t be sure they treat me with the same effort they treat someone they like (or at least don’t dislike).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I think you watch to much TV. That’s not how medicine works. How do you imagine it? I go to a doctor with migraine and he starts thinking real hard what could be the cause? And if he ‘despises’ me he just doesn’t think as hard?

            There are procedures doctors have to follow. If they fail to follow the procedures it’s malpractice. The procedures are the same for all doctors. There’s no ‘look, I did the bare minimum, you can’t punish me’. Either you did what was required or you didn’t. Each time a doctor would mistreat someone on purpose because he ‘despises’ them they would open themselves for investigation and a court case. That doesn’t mean there are no shitty doctor making mistakes, they would just have to be really dumb to do it in purpose.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Doctors are just humans. If they have a good day (hopefully often), they go out of their way to help you. I had a doctor call me on his personal time because he cared, and looked into literature to figure something weird out. But I also was there when he had a bad day (he was sick himself and a shit ton of patients to go through) so he just gave me a sick note, quick checkup and let me go. Doctors aren’t machines who work in an objective and reproducible way.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                You’re talking about a basic GP visit. The standard/expected practice is to prescribe ‘best guess’ medication and see if it improves. As you said you can get the equally bad treatment from a tired/sick doctor as from one who ‘despises’ you. It’s just a common risk everyone accepts so you’re comments about not wanting doctors who despise you treating you makes little sense. You can tell the doctor isn’t very good and go to another one. Where it could be important is a hospital visit and there are procedures to follow there. Doctor can’t just give you a sick note and send you home. If he does that’s malpractice.