So, it appears the first SMR project in the US was scrapped due to rising costs.

An Aussie SMR would take 10-15 years before even being online and we’d be the guinea pigs.

Perhaps it’s time to pivot to technology already available and that can be implemented in the short term?

  • @Alteon
    link
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There numerous projects out there, for example Ge Hitachi & Terrapower’s Natrium Development Project.

    https://www.terrapower.com/our-work/natriumpower/

    This will be a big one that’s supposed to work synergistically with renewable energy, able to scale up and down it’s power supply on demand.

    Not the end of the world…yet.

    Edit: This comment was talking about Nuclear Initiatives in general to the world, not specifically Australia, apologies. Once implemented and the efficiency is demonstrated, I believe that the plan is to build these around the world.

    • BadlyDrawnRhino
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      supposed to work synergistically with renewable energy

      Well, there’s your problem. They don’t want something to work alongside renewables. They want to delay renewables for as long as they possibly can to keep the mining gravy train chugging along for as long as possible.

      I think we do need to keep developing new technologies, because there are always going to be situations where renewables aren’t ideal, but that’s not the “problem” that SMRs in Australia are supposed to be solving.

      • 🦘min0nim🦘
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        You know what also works synergistically with renewables? More renewables!

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Are there any working now?

      How long to build one?

      How long before one could be up and running and adding to our power supply?