@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 1 year agoStarfield's DLSS patch shows that even in an AMD-sponsored game Nvidia is still king of upscalingwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up128arrow-down114
arrow-up114arrow-down1external-linkStarfield's DLSS patch shows that even in an AMD-sponsored game Nvidia is still king of upscalingwww.pcgamer.com@[email protected]M to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square3fedilink
minus-square@GlitzyArmrestlinkEnglish9•1 year agoI’m not sure you can draw that conclusion from a single patch in a single game.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoNo, but we can from all the other games that also include FSR & DLSS side by side. I’m glad FSR is a competitor and is gaining traction but the clarity, especially in motion, doesn’t compare to DLSS.
minus-squareBruceTwarzenlinkfedilink1•1 year agoThis game runs best on AMD. I mean not at launch. No bot after the first patches, but who knows what the future brings.
I’m not sure you can draw that conclusion from a single patch in a single game.
No, but we can from all the other games that also include FSR & DLSS side by side. I’m glad FSR is a competitor and is gaining traction but the clarity, especially in motion, doesn’t compare to DLSS.
This game runs best on AMD. I mean not at launch. No bot after the first patches, but who knows what the future brings.