"Best place in the world to manufacture solar:" Can Australia break China's PV grip? - One Step Off The Grid
onestepoffthegrid.com.au
SunDrive Solar is one of a handful of companies trying to establish a solar supply chain in Australia. Wyatt Roy, SunDrive's strategic advisor, says it's a global race – but Australia has a decent head start.

Australia is in a “global race” to stake a claim in the booming solar manufacture market – a supply chain spanning polysilicon, wafers, cells and modules that in 2021 was valued in excess of $US40 billion, an increase of more than 70% from 2020.

At the moment, China has an iron grip on the market, with a share in all of the manufacturing stages of solar panels exceeding 80%. According to the China Photovoltaic Industry Association, the nation’s annual export of solar PV products surpassed $US51 billion in 2022 – a year-on-year increase of 80.3%.

But can Australia muscle its way in?

Wyatt Roy, a former member of the federal Coalition government – and minister for innovation under Malcolm Turnbull – believes it can. And in his current role of strategic advisor to Sydney-based PV innovator and manufacturing start-up SunDrive Solar, Roy is doing his bit to bring some of those global solar billions home.

“You know, Australians love to talk ourselves down. But we literally invented modern solar technology,” Roy told One Step Off The Grid’s Solar Insiders Podcast this week.

“I think last year, globally, there was about $50 billion of revenue in the solar industry, essentially using IP from Australia.

“Unfortunately, very little value of that today is captured in Australia. As we know, 85 to 90% of the world’s solar panels are now manufactured in China. We’re very determined to change that.”

  • @MuThyme
    10•1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]OP
      1•1 year ago

      I find it highly hypocritical that while the LNP were fear mongering against China they enabled them to become the global leaders in PV manufacturing which turned into a $50 billion annual return (I think that’s the amount/rate the article cited) for them, which instead could have been flowing back into Aus.

      It’s also would have created thousands of jobs, you know, the thing the coalition were constantly proclaiming they were always working to create. Unless they meant creating jobs by casualising the work force so everyone could work fewer hours for each employer but he the “opportunity” to have multiple, lower hour jobs.