The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has now weighed in on the hospital situation in northern Gaza.

In a statement, it warned that hospitals in the Palestinian enclave have “reached a point of no return”, risking the lives of thousands of people.

The ICRC said its staff attempting to deliver medical supplies had witnessed “horrendous” scenes, and described the destruction as “unbearable”.

It also highlighted attacks on children’s hospitals, including Al-Rantisi, which we’ve been reporting on today, saying they had “not been spared from violence.”

The humanitarian organisation, which is the guardian of the Geneva Conventions, repeated its demand that hospitals and healthcare workers, under international law, must be protected.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -3
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Your entire world is you and the people who agree with you. People that don’t are not part of your world. Open source intelligence is a thing.

    • @Madison420
      link
      41 year ago

      Not at all babe, similarly that was a terrible attempt at gaslighting. Do better.

      Indeed it is, I can’t help but notice you didn’t provide any intelligence and I bet if I get into it your ip isn’t now nor has it ever likely been in the area of the Levant point blank period.

        • @Madison420
          link
          31 year ago

          Amusingly stupid.

          You link Israeli strikes and go “look things explode when you drop bombs on them! That’s proof!”

          You somehow think Israel, the country that makes the chains and refuses to substantiate them aren’t aware of your publicly posted Twitter videos… That an entire planet focused on the conflict somehow haven’t analyzed the claims and relevant videos… But you some douchebag on the Internet know better than all of them…

          Get a job, if you finna troll do better.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -21 year ago

            Sigh… the secondaries are proof that something explosive was his. Could it be rockets? Which is what I said before you butted into the conversation

            • @Madison420
              link
              31 year ago

              Well I’m glad I’ve gotten your military opinion. Remind me again what your qualifications are? Gunna go ahead and bet it’s not asymmetric warfare, eod, or munitions.

                • @Madison420
                  link
                  2
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The definition that directly describes this “war” and iirc actually references it in the sources.

                  Ed

                  The ongoing conflict between Israel and some Palestinian organizations (such as Hamas and Islamic Jihad) is a classic case of asymmetric warfare. Israel has a powerful army, air force and navy, while the Palestinian organizations have no access to large-scale military equipment with which to conduct operations;[41] instead, they utilize asymmetric tactics, such as knife attacks, small gunfights, cross-border sniping, rocket attacks,[42] and suicide bombings.[43][44]

                  You dumb.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -31 year ago

                    Yes but you obviously don’t understand what it means. How could secondary explosions be the result of asymmetrical warfare? Fact is Hamas stores rockets in tunnels near Hospitals. If they were actual a state with a professional army I guess they wouldn’t have to, but that seems besides the point.