• @SCB
      link
      English
      -31 year ago

      No, rather I am correct.

      • @constate368
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What percentage of the children do you think were ‘accidentally’ shot by snipers?

        • @SCB
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think few to no children were shot, but many were injured via indirect means, as I think I pretty clearly lay out.

          At the very minimum, it would be a rare occurrence for so many children to only be wounded if shot by a sniper rifle. It is unlikely, in general, that the wounds were from sniper rounds.

          • @constate368
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            The majority of the injured were children and two are in critical condition as a result of sniper fire targeting the hospital, a Red Crescent statement said.

            So they got injured running from sniper fire? Did the sniper pull off some James Bond shit and shoot a dangling object to fall on them?

            • @SCB
              link
              English
              -21 year ago

              Idk if you know this but sniper rifles are pretty powerful and fuck things up.

              • @constate368
                link
                English
                31 year ago

                Yeah, what you’re aiming at.

                • @SCB
                  link
                  English
                  -71 year ago

                  So clearly not aiming at children. Thanks.

                  • @constate368
                    link
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    They fuck up what you’re aiming at. In this case, mostly children.

                    Sorry if that was unclear.