“As the president of the United States, you have power to change the course of history, and the responsibility to save lives right now,” the staffers wrote.

  • @TokenBoomerOP
    link
    English
    -121 year ago

    Because it’s grammatically correct it’s not intentionally misleading. “As” is the keyword. Run has 645 meanings. Just because people interpret a phrase differently doesn’t mean it’s wrong, or malicious.

      • @TokenBoomerOP
        link
        English
        -101 year ago

        I proved that it is not grammatically wrong, can you prove that it is malicious?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          It leaves out context, intentionally. If this was a fox news headline, I’d say the same thing, and you’d agree.

          • @TokenBoomerOP
            link
            English
            -10
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The context is in the article. It could be argued that it is in the headline too, but some obviously have interpreted it differently.

            Edit: Replace “as” with “while” and maybe you’ll understand.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Indeed.

              Edit: You are just being condescending and not pointing out anything meaningful.

              • @TokenBoomerOP
                link
                English
                -71 year ago

                I’m not trying to be condescending. I’m just incapable of explaining this in a satisfactory way. Those criticizing the headline are not pointing out anything meaningful. The information in the article correlates with the headline. Biden has the ability to endorse a ceasefire, “while” his former staffers are urging him to do so.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  6
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  You are incapable of explaining it because it is an incredibly common and recognizable representation of a bad faith headline.

                  • @TokenBoomerOP
                    link
                    English
                    -61 year ago

                    Summarizing an article and writing a headline isn’t easy. I know from experience. It may be in bad faith, it doesn’t appear that way to me. It doesn’t detract from the relevant information in the article.