• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    501 year ago

    I know this thread is likely to quickly descend into 50 variants of “ew, snap”, but it’s a good write up of what is really a pretty interesting novel approach to the immutable desktop world.

    As the article says, it could well be the thing that actually justifies Canonical’s dogged perseverance with snaps in the first place.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I’m pretty excited about it. It’s a much cleaner solution to the problem immutable OSes are trying to solve. Dare I say it’s better even than the Android model because it covers the whole stack with a single system.

    • Chewy
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I don’t like Canonical pushing snaps as universal apps for all distros, because of issues like sandboxing not working on mainline kernels.

      But it’s pretty interesting to see how a fully snap based desktop OS could look like. It might have less limitations than rpm-ostree. Easy access to recent mesa and similar would be awesome.

      • @woelkchen
        link
        731 year ago

        But why is it an issue that Canonical controls a source of software for their own OS? Isn’t that the same with every distro’s repository?

        No. You can add any other repository to apt, rpm, Flatpak, etc. You cannot do the same with Snap and that’s by design. Canonical wants to be the sole gatekeeper of Linux software, hoping that all developers have no alternative but to publish software on the Snap store (ideally only there) which works best on Ubuntu.

        Therefore: Fuck Snap.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          231 year ago

          Exactly. I feel they want to sell it to a big player, but no big player will touch it unless they can fully control it. Hence snap as part of that plan. Ubuntu is a hell no for me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            121 year ago

            Forget selling it.
            I think they’re going to get everyone trapped in the ecosystem, and then they’ll start charging for access to the source.

              • Lilium
                link
                fedilink
                91 year ago

                That’s exactly what they’re trying to change.

                  • @woelkchen
                    link
                    11 year ago

                    Then I guess it’s a good thing they don’t control all other Linux distros.

                    But they would to a degree if the Snap Store would actually succeed becoming the Linux app store (like Steam is for games but that’s more because all other vendors don’t care to make a Linux client).

        • @KISSmyOS
          link
          -3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • @woelkchen
            link
            91 year ago

            Smoke and mirrors. You cannot add a secondary Snap repository.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You can; the issue is that you can’t add two snap repositories at once.

              This is functionally pretty much the same thing, as nobody is likely to want to use snap while locking themselves out of the main snap repository, but it’s still important to make the distinction.

              In theory I guess there’s nothing stopping you setting up a mirror of the main snap repo with automatic package scraping, but nobody’s really bothered exploring it seeing as no distro other than Ubuntu has taken any interest in running snap.

              • @woelkchen
                link
                11 year ago

                I know that it’s possible to change the one entry but adding additional ones is not possible and that’s by design.

                • @wmassingham
                  link
                  11 year ago

                  Is that an artificial limitation that could be resolved by third-party clients?

                  • @[email protected]OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    It’s all open source so there’s no reason you couldn’t fork it and add that functionality. Although it’d probably be a fairly involved piece of work; it wouldn’t be a simple one-line change.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            From reading this that’s not the whole story. Someone working at canonical successfully made a version of snap that could use alternative stores, but the default version does not allow it

            And honestly at the point of installing that modified version you may as well just install a different package manager anyway