• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    5011 months ago

    I know this thread is likely to quickly descend into 50 variants of “ew, snap”, but it’s a good write up of what is really a pretty interesting novel approach to the immutable desktop world.

    As the article says, it could well be the thing that actually justifies Canonical’s dogged perseverance with snaps in the first place.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      711 months ago

      I’m pretty excited about it. It’s a much cleaner solution to the problem immutable OSes are trying to solve. Dare I say it’s better even than the Android model because it covers the whole stack with a single system.

    • Chewy
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      I don’t like Canonical pushing snaps as universal apps for all distros, because of issues like sandboxing not working on mainline kernels.

      But it’s pretty interesting to see how a fully snap based desktop OS could look like. It might have less limitations than rpm-ostree. Easy access to recent mesa and similar would be awesome.

    • @KISSmyOS
      link
      3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @woelkchen
        link
        7311 months ago

        But why is it an issue that Canonical controls a source of software for their own OS? Isn’t that the same with every distro’s repository?

        No. You can add any other repository to apt, rpm, Flatpak, etc. You cannot do the same with Snap and that’s by design. Canonical wants to be the sole gatekeeper of Linux software, hoping that all developers have no alternative but to publish software on the Snap store (ideally only there) which works best on Ubuntu.

        Therefore: Fuck Snap.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2311 months ago

          Exactly. I feel they want to sell it to a big player, but no big player will touch it unless they can fully control it. Hence snap as part of that plan. Ubuntu is a hell no for me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1211 months ago

            Forget selling it.
            I think they’re going to get everyone trapped in the ecosystem, and then they’ll start charging for access to the source.

            • @KISSmyOS
              link
              2
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • Lilium
                link
                fedilink
                911 months ago

                That’s exactly what they’re trying to change.

                • @KISSmyOS
                  link
                  3
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • @woelkchen
                    link
                    111 months ago

                    Then I guess it’s a good thing they don’t control all other Linux distros.

                    But they would to a degree if the Snap Store would actually succeed becoming the Linux app store (like Steam is for games but that’s more because all other vendors don’t care to make a Linux client).

        • @KISSmyOS
          link
          -3
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          deleted by creator

          • @woelkchen
            link
            911 months ago

            Smoke and mirrors. You cannot add a secondary Snap repository.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              You can; the issue is that you can’t add two snap repositories at once.

              This is functionally pretty much the same thing, as nobody is likely to want to use snap while locking themselves out of the main snap repository, but it’s still important to make the distinction.

              In theory I guess there’s nothing stopping you setting up a mirror of the main snap repo with automatic package scraping, but nobody’s really bothered exploring it seeing as no distro other than Ubuntu has taken any interest in running snap.

              • @woelkchen
                link
                111 months ago

                I know that it’s possible to change the one entry but adding additional ones is not possible and that’s by design.

                • @wmassingham
                  link
                  111 months ago

                  Is that an artificial limitation that could be resolved by third-party clients?

                  • @[email protected]OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    111 months ago

                    It’s all open source so there’s no reason you couldn’t fork it and add that functionality. Although it’d probably be a fairly involved piece of work; it wouldn’t be a simple one-line change.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            511 months ago

            From reading this that’s not the whole story. Someone working at canonical successfully made a version of snap that could use alternative stores, but the default version does not allow it

            And honestly at the point of installing that modified version you may as well just install a different package manager anyway