By MAYA ZANGER-NADIS NOVEMBER 12, 2023 19:09 Updated: NOVEMBER 12, 2023 21:26


Israeli security forces delivered 300 liters of diesel fuel to Shifa Hospital in Gaza early Sunday morning and later received intelligence indicating that Hamas had intercepted the delivery, according to a Sunday night IDF statement.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    561 year ago

    If we were to be devils advocates for a second here… if you knew that the terrorists that you’re trying to wipe out would steal any fuel you send in, but everyone keeps telling you to do it anyway, would you send 9000 litres and resupply your adversary or would you send a few hundred litres and record what happens to make a point?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 year ago

      Especially since you can send another 300 liters, or even more, as soon as you see it actually going to the hospital.

      Also, the hospital most certainly does not need 10000 liters a day for critical equipment. (To run everything like normal, maybe.)

        • TheDankHold
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Need? No.

          We still know many situations where the IDF has done that regardless.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        That doesn’t even make sense. I understand everyone’s emotions are high, and what is happening is truly tragic, but can we at least agree on some common logical foundation?

    • @Maalus
      link
      English
      -71 year ago

      You would send all the fuel a catastrophic situation needs. That’s the point of humanitarian help.

      But who are we kidding, if not for international pressure, there would never be any humanitarian help. Or there woulf still be 20 trucks a day, with water for 20k people, in a city of 2 million

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        You would send all the fuel a catastrophic situation needs.

        Even if you knew the aid wouldn’t arrive, but instead would be used to extend the cause of the catastrophic situation?

        • @Maggoty
          link
          English
          -11 year ago

          The hospitals were running fine before the Israelis shut off their power.

            • @Maggoty
              link
              English
              -21 year ago

              Nobody declared war on Oct 7th. Israel has been illegally occupying Palestine (any definition of it’s borders) for decades and has been operating a blockade of Gaza for about a decade.

              Both of those are acts of war. One of them is also a war crime. So don’t come crying that Israel got attacked. They could absolutely have kept the power on.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 year ago

                There was a cease fire in place before that. One side broke the cease fire. That’s initiating war. That was an intentional, planned decision to start a war.

                • @Maggoty
                  link
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  That makes no sense. You have to be at war to have a cease fire and they are temporary by nature. The 50 year cease fire in Korea is famous for being the only one to last so long.

                  Furthermore it was only weeks after the 2014 cease fire that Israel shot an unarmed farmer inside Gaza. You cannot claim there was a cease fire if you were commiting war crimes during it.

            • TheDankHold
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              Israel controls their electric grid so they by default have responsibility.

            • @Maggoty
              link
              English
              11 year ago

              Israel specifically prevented Hamas from being able to provide power on their own with the blockade. They were also already supplying it, suggesting a duty to aid.

        • @filister
          link
          English
          -31 year ago

          And how exactly do you know that? And yes as an empathetic human being I would definitely try to help and fail rather than not trying. At least I would know that I have tried.

          And just to remind you, the propaganda is not only on one of the sides, but both. And accepting everything IDF is saying as true is a very one-sided way to look at this conflict!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            People trying to help and making the situation worse does not help, at all. Putting soothing your own feelings above the pragmatic requirements to solve the situation does not help

            This is why politicians are universally hated, but still required

            • @filister
              link
              English
              -21 year ago

              Let them all die then. Right? They are anyway on the wrong side of the fence!

                • TheDankHold
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -31 year ago

                  You’re right, you’re too much of a coward to get to the end of the logic of your position.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Well you’d know because you have the intelligence that shows that Hamas has been stealing fuel reserves at large. And you’d confirm it by sending a few Jerry cans worth of fuel to the hospital to see if they’d be allowed on or if they’d be stolen. You’re acting like they didn’t attempt to help at all.

            These sorts of actions are designed to be trust building exercises. They prove viability of the general concept.