Heya folks, some people online told me I was doing partitions wrong, but I’ve been doing it this way for years. Since I’ve been doing it for years, I could be doing it in an outdated way, so I thought I should ask.

I have separate partitions for EFI, /, swap, and /home. Am I doing it wrong? Here’s how my partition table looks like:

  • FAT32: EFI
  • BTRFS: /
  • Swap: Swap
  • Ext4: /home

I set it up this way so that if I need to reinstall Linux, I can just overwrite / while preserving /home and just keep working after a new install with very few hiccups. Someone told me there’s no reason to use multiple partitions, but several times I have needed to reinstall the OS (Linux Mint) while preserving /home so this advice makes zero sense for me. But maybe it was just explained to me wrong and I really am doing it in an outdated way. I’d like to read what you say about this though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    Getting the size wrong and needing to resize is the effort part for me. Resizing/moving my partitions is always a pain.

    • Quazatron
      link
      21 year ago

      Once you learn about LVM, you’ll never use a naked partition again. Or your money back.

      • Idiocy
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Thanks for your consultation about lvm.

        I’ll take a look.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Last time i used LVM was way back in fedora 8 days, when it was the default partition. It was super annoying to use, as gparted didnt support it, and live cds often had trouble with it. Having to read doco to resize it was pretty not good for a newbie to linux. Has it improved since?

        • Quazatron
          link
          11 year ago

          LVM does have a bit of a learning curve, but once you’re over it, you realise how dumb it is to keep partitioning disks like it’s 1995.

          Most if not all graphical disk managers now work with LVM.