• @LemmyIsFantastic
    link
    English
    -191 year ago

    Most Lamborghini owners aren’t spending their salary or working overtime.

    You only need to be in the top 5-10% of earners in the US to start to afford the cheaper super cars. They already own their home and are enjoying life.

    • @banneryear1868OP
      link
      English
      351 year ago

      They already own their home and are enjoying life.

      -by exploiting other’s labor and creating a bigger wealth disparity than has ever existed

      • @LemmyIsFantastic
        link
        English
        -201 year ago

        Blah blah blah, I know anyone who makes more than 150k a year bougie and stealing from the poor. You ain’t going to make headway there with me

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          It’s not the amount of money it’s the method of acquisition. An engineer or independent contractor or something could make that kind of money and still not be considered bourgeoisie. (Though probably petit-bourgeoisie?)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 year ago

            (Though probably petit-bourgeoisie?)

            Still a prole until you stop relying on selling your labour power for money. Though an outlier statistically.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It did make me think of examples where there are edge cases though. Say a freelancer or an artist that, although they do not directly employ people, their income from their work could be greatly multiplied by the work done by others. In the end it might just boil down to details whether such an arrangement is or is not petit bourgeoisie.

      • @banneryear1868OP
        link
        English
        15
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The meme’s not really about the car it’s about the ideology of the person in it and how common that “consoom your way to freedom” view is among certain males in particular. Cars are whatever and sometimes amazing machines, like yeah maybe people shouldn’t be able to buy million dollar vehicles while other people starve, but that goes way beyond a car and more like the whole structure of capitalist economy.

    • eric
      link
      English
      141 year ago

      Congrats. You’ve missed the point entirely.

      • @LemmyIsFantastic
        link
        English
        -14
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Whatever you say. I’m pretty sure you just don’t like the idea that middle class individuals can afford supercars and don’t have to sell their soul.

        • Unaware7013
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          You only need to be in the top 5-10% of earners in the US to start to afford the cheaper super cars.

          I’m pretty sure you just don’t like the idea that middle class individuals can afford supercars

          Which is it? Can I be middle class and afford a supercar, or do I need to be upper class (being in the top 10% of earners) to be able to afford one? Because I’d love to hear an argument that “middle class” and “top 10%” are remotely the same that didn’t make me laugh in your face.

          • @LemmyIsFantastic
            link
            English
            -41 year ago

            170k puts you in the to 10%

            If you really can’t do the math on how someone making 150 can make a cheap supercar when for them that’s on you. It’s clear you never once been to a meet or track day and are just making shit up as you go.

        • eric
          link
          English
          71 year ago

          lol that’s a hellofalot of projection, but whatever helps you cope, bud.