The Dutch minister of Defense is furious about the leaking of a memo that confirms israel does not have a plan in Gaza and is trying to maximize civilian casualties.

  • sab
    link
    fedilink
    -11 year ago

    That’s your words, not the Dutch. Doesn’t mean you’re wrong; that’s a different debate entirely.

    • SleepyWheel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Israel “intends to deliberately cause massive destruction to infrastructure and civilian centers” while taking large numbers of civilian casualties for granted. That violates the laws of war, the memo states.

      I guess you’re arguing the memo only accuses them of intending to destroy “civilian centres”, not civilians. But "“taking large numbers of civilian casualties for granted” is part of the intent. Israel is the arsonist who knows there are children sleeping in the house.

      My view is that the Dutch are, in diplomatic language, saying that.

    • Piecemakers
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Honoring their CYA phrasing on a mere technicality is a pretty shit take, citizen.

      • sab
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        Personally I think warping people’s word for no good reason other than to simplify things to better fit your own interpretation of reality is a pretty shit take, but each to their own I guess.

        • Piecemakers
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          Clarifying purposefully obfuscated phrasing is hardly “warping”, and your assumption of narrative intent on OP’s part is beneath you. How many of those politicians even remotely connected to that certified release above do you suppose even know your name, much less give two soggy shits if you exist? Don’t bootlick, and don’t pontificate. 🤷🏼‍♂️