• @YoBuckStopsHereOP
    link
    English
    1711 months ago

    So you don’t believe in free trade? Without navy ships the global trade market is destroyed and the world quickly falls in a World War.

    • sebinspace
      link
      -2111 months ago

      Evel Knievel couldn’t have made that leap…

      • @YoBuckStopsHereOP
        link
        English
        2411 months ago

        Not for anyone who has a basic understanding of geopolitics. Do you want rogue nations hoarding resources? Do you want Superpowers to act as the British Empire did and enslave entire nations and exploit them at the point of a gun? The massive zerg rush to resources would instantly cause a world war. Right now you have a system where the world trades for goods and everyone profits that is a part of that trade. Take that away and you have trouble.

        • sebinspace
          link
          -711 months ago

          I’m not sure if you’re aware of this, but it is possible to want part of the game to work differently without also wanting the complete collapse of the game proper.

          • @YoBuckStopsHereOP
            link
            English
            1211 months ago

            I want a lot of things, but that doesn’t mean it is never moderately possible.

      • BombOmOm
        link
        English
        2311 months ago

        The US Navy is the global security provider of free trade on the sea. It is one of their core functions. To ‘just go back to our own borders’ would be to completely remove the only naval force cable of providing security for free trade on the sea and thus remove huge portions of safe, navigable waters for said trade.

        Who else has the navy to make it happen? China’s navy has no range, France and England’s navies have the range but aren’t large enough. Everyone else’s navy is too small and can’t deploy at range.

        • JJROKCZ
          link
          -2111 months ago

          We don’t have pirate fleets anymore and any pirate group that obtains a ship big enough to really be a danger would be eradicated as soon as they showed their hand.

            • JJROKCZ
              link
              -311 months ago

              It in any meaningful way to world trade though

              • brianorca
                link
                311 months ago

                Because Navy ships patrol those routes. Remove that, and the pirates would be able to expand.

                • JJROKCZ
                  link
                  -211 months ago

                  With what? Their little dingys are no threat to a cargo ship with a few armed guards. If they somehow get ahold of a real vessel then a national navy can go sink it

                  • @assassin_aragorn
                    link
                    211 months ago

                    The whole idea is to not let things get to that point.

                    It’s also important to recognize, the US withdrawing internationally (and wasting tons of money we’ve already spent, mind you) doesn’t mean places become a harmonious area. Another country will replace it.

                    Given how much international water China already claims is actually Chinese territory, and their ships harassing and sinking civilian fishing vessels, I would rather stay with the devil i know.

            • JJROKCZ
              link
              111 months ago

              The significantly smaller fleets that aren’t spending their time doing laps but are waiting for the call to splash some pirates

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Apart from piracy still being in a thing, there are many states that will illegally seize and impound other nations’ vessels if given the chance.