• @ttmrichter
    link
    English
    0
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There are users to be had.

    You’re still stuck in the mindset of surveillance capitalism. To an instance, users are a cost item, not a profit item. Meta/Alphabet/et al want all teh yoozers because that’s where they siphon up the data that makes them their money. Users are a small cost item compared to the income they get from that data.

    A Mastodon or Calckey or Lemmy or whatever instance doesn’t make bank from having a huge user count. There’s no incentive to vacuum up all teh yoozers.