Site Not Available
www.koat.com

Woman calls the police saying she thinks her caregiver is going to kill her and to get her out, the cops come, complement her caregiver’s weapons, and leave; hours later, the caregiver kills her.

  • @[email protected]
    64•1 year ago

    Yeah, but you cut off the most insane part:

    “What did you say?” Fannell asked.

    “I said you’re fine until I kill you,” Cardana said.

    “All right? He’s threatened to do that,” Fannell said to the Rio Rancho police officers.

    “Get out of here now,” Cardana said to the officers. “Go away.”

    The two officers leave, and four hours later, 911 receives another call.

    Just… wow. Gun nuts will never do anything against other gun nuts I guess.

      • @SheeEttinEnglish
        0•1 year ago

        Can we stop with the penis thing for every damn issue already

      • @Zoboomafoo
        -23•1 year ago

        Why are people who want to ban guns so weirdly sexual about it?

        • TheWoozy
          29•1 year ago

          They are merely recognizing that “gun enthusiasm” is a fetish to the enthusiasts.

          • @Zoboomafoo
            -15•1 year ago

            Well, it’s weird and gross. It also pushes away anyone that owns guns and would be willing to compromise

            • qevlarr
              13•1 year ago

              “As a responsible gun owner I wanted common sense gun legislation, but then someone compared my hobby to a sexual fetish, and now I think convicted domestic abusers have a right to own an AR-15”

              lol

              • @Zoboomafoo
                -5•1 year ago

                Put words in my mouth more, daddy.

                Then keep wondering why no legislation gets passed even though 68% of the US supports stricter gun laws, me included.

                  • @Zoboomafoo
                    1•1 year ago

                    Funny, those look like completely different words with different meanings than what I said

            • @[email protected]
              7•1 year ago

              This could be the most hamfisted bit of manipulation and tone policing I’ve ever seen.

              “We were just about to compromise after 25 years of spitting on children for not being pro-gun enough after their school shooting, but then I wasn’t allowed to tone police a comment that quoted two legal gun owners flirting over the upcoming murder of a vulnerable person, so instead I’m going to align myself with domestic abusers, murderers and extremists”.

              You should be thankful you’re not being called far, far worse things.

              • @Zoboomafoo
                -6•1 year ago

                Gunowners aren’t a monolith, and treating them as such is a great way to alienate potential allies

                But by all means, keep spitting on gunowners for 25 years, that’ll make a difference.

                I’ve got a neat concept for you that you might have never heard of, it’s called “compromise”. It’s where both sides of a negotiation get some, but not all of what they want.