But critics insist the costs of those solar panels are beginning to outweigh the benefits.
Incentive payments to homes with solar, they say, have led to higher electricity rates for everyone else — including families that can’t afford rooftop panels. If so, that’s not only unfair, it’s damaging to the state’s climate progress. Higher electricity rates make it less likely that people will drive electric cars and install electric heat pumps in their homes — crucial climate solutions.
The solar industry disputes the argument that solar incentive payments are driving up rates, as do many environmental activists. But Newsom’s appointees to the Public Utilities Commission are convinced, as they made clear Thursday.
“We need to reach our [climate] goals as fast as we can,” said Alice Reynolds, the commission’s president. “But we also need to be extremely thoughtful about how we reach our climate change goals in the most cost-effective manner.”
When I am having a stroke, I don’t stop and calculate of the most cost effective treatment options. I go to the emergency room. We could have done this calculation in 1970 and acted, but that ship has sailed.
I don’t fully agree with that but even with that argument then it doesn’t take any more cost or work if you use a lot or a little amount of electricity. Then there is simply no justification to charge a transmission cost other than to disincentivize solar because it’s eating into the grid operators profits.
deleted by creator
Physics has nothing to do with it, this is all economics and what is fair. We’re talking about the policy of how to charge people and your videos don’t make the point you think they are. I understand how the grid works but the balancing of it is a fraction of the cost to what it takes to build and maintain the grid.
deleted by creator
Great job explaining this better than I did. It’s hard to explain issues like this without sounding like we are coming out against solar energy.