Grayox to [email protected] • 1 year agoHow did this break rule 1? Did you just not read the 2nd panel?lemmy.mlimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1465arrow-down1101
arrow-up1364arrow-down1imageHow did this break rule 1? Did you just not read the 2nd panel?lemmy.mlGrayox to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year agoEven if that argument was viable, I would argue Israel’s genocide starting less than a century ago makes it much more imperative to act against it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•1 year agoSo instead we should genocide Israelis or what is your suggestion?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoPalestinians taking their land back is justice after a century of genocide, not genocide.
Even if that argument was viable, I would argue Israel’s genocide starting less than a century ago makes it much more imperative to act against it.
So instead we should genocide Israelis or what is your suggestion?
Palestinians taking their land back is justice after a century of genocide, not genocide.
Do you mean the settlements in the Westbank?